Ubuntu dominates servers, but one choice killed it on the desktop
When spinning up a VPS or a local LXC, reaching for Ubuntu has almost become reflexive for me. It's what most tutorials assume, the server images are tuned for it, and it's what many of the internet's Linux instances already run, but you hardly see it land on an enthusiast's daily-driver desktop anymore. The preferred distros for desktop use have firmly shifted toward Arch-based flavors, Fedora, and Mint. If you've been paying attention, you'd know that this is hardly an accident, and one particular design decision explains a lot of it: Canonical's all-in bet on snap packages.
When spinning up a VPS or a local LXC, reaching for Ubuntu has almost become reflexive for me. It’s what most tutorials a**ume, the server images are tuned for it, and it’s what many of the internet’s Linux instances already run, but you hardly see it land on an enthusiast’s daily-driver desktop anymore. The preferred distros for desktop use have firmly shifted toward Arch-based flavors, Fedora, and Mint. If you’ve been paying attention, you’d know that this is hardly an accident, and one particular design decision explains a lot of it: Canonical’s all-in bet on snap packages.
Michael Johnson
Chicago
Chicago
Published by: aplhsindia.in
